the thing: what happens when physical world becomes connected (microwave example does quite cut it 0.1.), transformation of agriculture, browse the physical world (QR codes that you can embed in t-shirts, picture recognition combined w. mobile connectivity = more data and usability to where you are, etc), geospatiality (location based services [this is so late 90's it hurts], geotagging), 3D internet, webservices (netwibes, via the browser, yahoo-pipes development-platform), intergration (i.e. enterpises take on web2 modus operandi, stadards based, service oriented, etc.).
net generation (baby-boomer echo): yes they use the web, yes its a gap appearing, globally the young people live in india and china. russia hardly any, same goes for most west. countries. these are the digital natives are quite reliant on their conncetivity. This is the generation of content creators (brain actually developes diffrently if you compute/play games, brain is like a muscle - the parts of it that are used to get more powerful). This generation has some new norms: freedom, customization, scrutinity, integrity, collaboration, entertainment, speed, innovation (WTF, innovation as a norm, i thought its a way to speak with out sating much).
social revolution: blogger gets more hits than CNN = collaborative things are winning (its not enough to passively feed the news, but get comments, I'm ready for some fresh insights, come on!), wikipedia = 1 million editors committed to the idea of collaboration for knowledge, collaborative meritocraties (a mix a hieracrhichy, collaborative meritocracy, top is responsible for vision, filtering, making final decisions and SETTING STANDARDS for key processes), middle is the key-contributors (influence and contribute) and finlaly the freeriders and casual commentators.
market / economic revolution: as the cost of collaboration has fallen, the ability to find people who can contribute parts to your value processes has dramatically fallen. that makes corporations virtual and global mass collaboration the way to produce (now were getting somewhere, prior this sounded like a first year tech. research analyst practise presentation). ultimately this means that talent is inside and outisde the corporations. Now Linux Explosion (or something like that) managed to link the open source mode into big corporations like IBM, that managed to sell more consulting and services that run on linux. this resulted into one billion biz for IBM. Ideagoras: Innocentive by P&G, tried to source 50% of innovations outside the company. The company realised that they can only hire only 0.5 % of experts on the market. Now the company have scientists around the world. Prosumtion (really do not rate this word, sorry, its still very produsction-consumption -circle-driven). Combination of the two.
New Models of Scientific Collaboration: earth systeem grid, word community grid, human genome, ksy survey, etc. mass collaboration is rapidly speeding up for example in astronomy. MC could have implications to "genome ownership". it was at one point 50% of the code was in private hands. merc changed this, by opening up on and competition became on excution, the applications, not ther genoma itself.
Marko Parkkinen asks: what happens to the world economics if innovation is open? Williams: 1. value crfeation is shifting to new boundaries, the money comes from new markets - it hurts some companies, but there's ecosystems of new. 2. free collaboration may eventually lead into monetisation of the innovations and other contributions - free collaboration will not be that free in the future. AND you need still people inside the companies, someone has to transform the innovations into saleable products and services. this is healthy for the economics.
public sector: there's a future of the public sector research that new paradigm starts... web 2.0 tools to engage people into policy discussions. its also possible to get innovations for the public services from the users. the US fed uses wikis for example - CIA has put together intellipedia (am I tripping?). It gathers security data from governement officials on different offices - this is not open to everyone, but there's different layers of secrecy (I'm not tripping).
Milloin koittaa Net Generaation jälkeinen aika? Puhutaanko sukupolvista vai tietynlaisen käyttökulttuurin (kulttuurisen muutoksen?) "normalisoitumisesta"? Kehittyykö Nettisukupolvella instant mediaymmärrys? By doing? By being? Eikö internetin tulevaisuus olekaan moniaistisuus ja reaaliaikaisuus, miten Williamsin "3D web" sopii kuvioihin? Mitä arvoa 3D tuo yritysten toimintatapoihin? Julkisten palveluiden web-presenssille? Jaikuamiselle?
Käyttökulttuurin normalisoituminen ei ihan vielä kuulosta sukupolvirajalta. Tosi hatara arvaukseni seuraavaksi sukupolvirajaksi on ilmastonmuutos - siihen reagoiminen ja sitä rajoittavan elämäntavan omaksuminen. Tai vaikka kybernetiikka.
@nieminensundell meinasin kybernetiikan käyttöönottoa omaan kehoon. mutta se nyt oli täysin väkinäistä muutosvoiman hakemista tähän sukupolvikeskusteluun.
Sukupolvet on tärkeitä firmoille, jotka segmentoi kuluttajiaan. Ne haluaa demografista rajanvetoa, jotta voivat kohdentaa viestejään oikeisiin markkinointikanaviin.
31 comments so far
4 drivers: web2, net generation, social revolution (ehem, eiks revolution ole alunperin juuri SOCIAL) ja markets
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
vantaallapa hyvinkin :-)
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
tulevaisuuden hahmottaminen lähtee näköjään teknologian mahdollisuuksista
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
ehkä tää on esityksen "change is happening" osio
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
the thing: what happens when physical world becomes connected (microwave example does quite cut it 0.1.), transformation of agriculture, browse the physical world (QR codes that you can embed in t-shirts, picture recognition combined w. mobile connectivity = more data and usability to where you are, etc), geospatiality (location based services [this is so late 90's it hurts], geotagging), 3D internet, webservices (netwibes, via the browser, yahoo-pipes development-platform), intergration (i.e. enterpises take on web2 modus operandi, stadards based, service oriented, etc.).
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
>ehkä tää on esityksen "change is happening" osio
hope so
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
demographich revolution
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
net generation alkaa 1976 syntyneistä
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
aivot kehittyy kuin lihakset kuormituksessa - uusi pelejä ja sosiaalista mediaa käyttävä mediasukupolvi saa erilaiset aivot
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
olivat pyytäneet nuoria tekemään kollaaseja siitä miltä tuntuisi olla ilman sosiaalista mediaa - aika tuskaa - irtirevitty fiilis
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
olivat pyytäneet nuoria tekemään kollaaseja siitä miltä tuntuisi olla ilman sosiaalista mediaa - aika tuskaa - irtirevitty fiilis
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
esiteltiin net generation norms
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
net generation (baby-boomer echo): yes they use the web, yes its a gap appearing, globally the young people live in india and china. russia hardly any, same goes for most west. countries. these are the digital natives are quite reliant on their conncetivity. This is the generation of content creators (brain actually developes diffrently if you compute/play games, brain is like a muscle - the parts of it that are used to get more powerful). This generation has some new norms: freedom, customization, scrutinity, integrity, collaboration, entertainment, speed, innovation (WTF, innovation as a norm, i thought its a way to speak with out sating much).
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
collaborative content communities ohitti monella alueella perinteiset mediat nettihuomiossa 2006
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
collaborative meritocracies - onko se pyramidi vai sipuli? - tänään se on pyramidi
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
social revolution: blogger gets more hits than CNN = collaborative things are winning (its not enough to passively feed the news, but get comments, I'm ready for some fresh insights, come on!), wikipedia = 1 million editors committed to the idea of collaboration for knowledge, collaborative meritocraties (a mix a hieracrhichy, collaborative meritocracy, top is responsible for vision, filtering, making final decisions and SETTING STANDARDS for key processes), middle is the key-contributors (influence and contribute) and finlaly the freeriders and casual commentators.
(heiluttelee käsiään, vähän)
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
market / economic revolution: as the cost of collaboration has fallen, the ability to find people who can contribute parts to your value processes has dramatically fallen. that makes corporations virtual and global mass collaboration the way to produce (now were getting somewhere, prior this sounded like a first year tech. research analyst practise presentation). ultimately this means that talent is inside and outisde the corporations. Now Linux Explosion (or something like that) managed to link the open source mode into big corporations like IBM, that managed to sell more consulting and services that run on linux. this resulted into one billion biz for IBM. Ideagoras: Innocentive by P&G, tried to source 50% of innovations outside the company. The company realised that they can only hire only 0.5 % of experts on the market. Now the company have scientists around the world. Prosumtion (really do not rate this word, sorry, its still very produsction-consumption -circle-driven). Combination of the two.
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
New Models of Scientific Collaboration: earth systeem grid, word community grid, human genome, ksy survey, etc. mass collaboration is rapidly speeding up for example in astronomy. MC could have implications to "genome ownership". it was at one point 50% of the code was in private hands. merc changed this, by opening up on and competition became on excution, the applications, not ther genoma itself.
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
the future of small and large enterprises is in worldsourcing: no single HQ, porous corporate boundaries combined global processes and capabilities.
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
Marko Parkkinen asks: what happens to the world economics if innovation is open? Williams: 1. value crfeation is shifting to new boundaries, the money comes from new markets - it hurts some companies, but there's ecosystems of new. 2. free collaboration may eventually lead into monetisation of the innovations and other contributions - free collaboration will not be that free in the future. AND you need still people inside the companies, someone has to transform the innovations into saleable products and services. this is healthy for the economics.
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
public sector: there's a future of the public sector research that new paradigm starts... web 2.0 tools to engage people into policy discussions. its also possible to get innovations for the public services from the users. the US fed uses wikis for example - CIA has put together intellipedia (am I tripping?). It gathers security data from governement officials on different offices - this is not open to everyone, but there's different layers of secrecy (I'm not tripping).
1 year, 9 months ago by mokka
Täältä kans toisaalle: http://pirkka.jaiku.com/presence/30114043
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
Täältä saa ne muistiinpanot, minulta ainoastaan omat ranskalaiset viivani! :-D
1 year, 9 months ago by pirkka
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nieminensundell/2366420020/in/datetaken/
1 year, 9 months ago by nieminensundell
Milloin koittaa Net Generaation jälkeinen aika? Puhutaanko sukupolvista vai tietynlaisen käyttökulttuurin (kulttuurisen muutoksen?) "normalisoitumisesta"? Kehittyykö Nettisukupolvella instant mediaymmärrys? By doing? By being? Eikö internetin tulevaisuus olekaan moniaistisuus ja reaaliaikaisuus, miten Williamsin "3D web" sopii kuvioihin? Mitä arvoa 3D tuo yritysten toimintatapoihin? Julkisten palveluiden web-presenssille? Jaikuamiselle?
1 year, 9 months ago by soppa
Ehkä tässä voisi olla kyse kulttuurikynnyksestä, jonka jälkeen sukupolvet ovat osa "uutta" käyttökulttuuria. By doing.
1 year, 9 months ago by nieminensundell
Käyttökulttuurin normalisoituminen ei ihan vielä kuulosta sukupolvirajalta. Tosi hatara arvaukseni seuraavaksi sukupolvirajaksi on ilmastonmuutos - siihen reagoiminen ja sitä rajoittavan elämäntavan omaksuminen. Tai vaikka kybernetiikka.
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
Mä kyllä rikon tommosia sukupolvirajoja ikoko ajan ihan itse. Ja kybernetiikka oli tosi muodikasta 70-luvulla.
1 year, 9 months ago by nieminensundell
Miks noita sukupolvia ylipäätään kelataan niin innokkaasti?
Wikipediasta löytyy artikkelit ainakin sukupolvista: X, Y, Z ja I. Ja XY-sukupolvikin on tunnistettu :-)
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
@nieminensundell meinasin kybernetiikan käyttöönottoa omaan kehoon. mutta se nyt oli täysin väkinäistä muutosvoiman hakemista tähän sukupolvikeskusteluun.
1 year, 9 months ago by pe3
Sukupolvet on tärkeitä firmoille, jotka segmentoi kuluttajiaan. Ne haluaa demografista rajanvetoa, jotta voivat kohdentaa viestejään oikeisiin markkinointikanaviin.
1 year, 9 months ago by nieminensundell