the thing: what happens when physical world becomes connected
(microwave example does quite cut it 0.1.), transformation of
agriculture, browse the physical world (QR codes that you can embed
in t-shirts, picture recognition combined w. mobile connectivity =
more data and usability to where you are, etc), geospatiality
(location based services [this is so late 90's it hurts],
geotagging), 3D internet, webservices (netwibes, via the browser,
yahoo-pipes development-platform), intergration (i.e. enterpises
take on web2 modus operandi, stadards based, service oriented,
etc.).
net generation (baby-boomer echo): yes they use the web, yes its
a gap appearing, globally the young people live in india and china.
russia hardly any, same goes for most west. countries. these are
the digital natives are quite reliant on their conncetivity. This
is the generation of content creators (brain actually developes
diffrently if you compute/play games, brain is like a muscle - the
parts of it that are used to get more powerful). This generation
has some new norms: freedom, customization, scrutinity, integrity,
collaboration, entertainment, speed, innovation (WTF, innovation as
a norm, i thought its a way to speak with out sating much).
social revolution: blogger gets more hits than CNN =
collaborative things are winning (its not enough to passively feed
the news, but get comments, I'm ready for some fresh insights, come
on!), wikipedia = 1 million editors committed to the idea of
collaboration for knowledge, collaborative meritocraties (a mix a
hieracrhichy, collaborative meritocracy, top is responsible for
vision, filtering, making final decisions and SETTING STANDARDS for
key processes), middle is the key-contributors (influence and
contribute) and finlaly the freeriders and casual commentators.
market / economic revolution: as the cost of collaboration has
fallen, the ability to find people who can contribute parts to your
value processes has dramatically fallen. that makes corporations
virtual and global mass collaboration the way to produce (now were
getting somewhere, prior this sounded like a first year tech.
research analyst practise presentation). ultimately this means that
talent is inside and outisde the corporations. Now Linux Explosion
(or something like that) managed to link the open source mode into
big corporations like IBM, that managed to sell more consulting and
services that run on linux. this resulted into one billion biz for
IBM. Ideagoras: Innocentive by P&G, tried to source 50% of
innovations outside the company. The company realised that they can
only hire only 0.5 % of experts on the market. Now the company have
scientists around the world. Prosumtion (really do not rate this
word, sorry, its still very produsction-consumption
-circle-driven). Combination of the two.
New Models of Scientific Collaboration: earth systeem grid, word
community grid, human genome, ksy survey, etc. mass collaboration
is rapidly speeding up for example in astronomy. MC could have
implications to "genome ownership". it was at one point 50% of the
code was in private hands. merc changed this, by opening up on and
competition became on excution, the applications, not ther genoma
itself.
Marko Parkkinen asks: what happens to the world economics if
innovation is open? Williams: 1. value crfeation is shifting to new
boundaries, the money comes from new markets - it hurts some
companies, but there's ecosystems of new. 2. free collaboration may
eventually lead into monetisation of the innovations and other
contributions - free collaboration will not be that free in the
future. AND you need still people inside the companies, someone has
to transform the innovations into saleable products and services.
this is healthy for the economics.
public sector: there's a future of the public sector research
that new paradigm starts... web 2.0 tools to engage people into
policy discussions. its also possible to get innovations for the
public services from the users. the US fed uses wikis for example -
CIA has put together intellipedia (am I tripping?). It gathers
security data from governement officials on different offices -
this is not open to everyone, but there's different layers of
secrecy (I'm not tripping).
Milloin koittaa Net Generaation jälkeinen aika? Puhutaanko
sukupolvista vai tietynlaisen käyttökulttuurin (kulttuurisen
muutoksen?) "normalisoitumisesta"? Kehittyykö Nettisukupolvella
instant mediaymmärrys? By doing? By being? Eikö internetin
tulevaisuus olekaan moniaistisuus ja reaaliaikaisuus, miten
Williamsin "3D web" sopii kuvioihin? Mitä arvoa 3D tuo yritysten
toimintatapoihin? Julkisten palveluiden web-presenssille?
Jaikuamiselle?
Käyttökulttuurin normalisoituminen ei ihan vielä kuulosta
sukupolvirajalta. Tosi hatara arvaukseni seuraavaksi
sukupolvirajaksi on ilmastonmuutos - siihen reagoiminen ja sitä
rajoittavan elämäntavan omaksuminen. Tai vaikka
kybernetiikka.
@nieminensundell
meinasin kybernetiikan käyttöönottoa omaan kehoon. mutta se nyt
oli täysin väkinäistä muutosvoiman hakemista tähän
sukupolvikeskusteluun.
Sukupolvet on tärkeitä firmoille, jotka segmentoi
kuluttajiaan. Ne haluaa demografista rajanvetoa, jotta voivat
kohdentaa viestejään oikeisiin markkinointikanaviin.
32 comments so far
4 drivers: web2, net generation, social revolution (ehem, eiks revolution ole alunperin juuri SOCIAL) ja markets
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
vantaallapa hyvinkin :-)
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
tulevaisuuden hahmottaminen lähtee näköjään teknologian mahdollisuuksista
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
ehkä tää on esityksen "change is happening" osio
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
the thing: what happens when physical world becomes connected (microwave example does quite cut it 0.1.), transformation of agriculture, browse the physical world (QR codes that you can embed in t-shirts, picture recognition combined w. mobile connectivity = more data and usability to where you are, etc), geospatiality (location based services [this is so late 90's it hurts], geotagging), 3D internet, webservices (netwibes, via the browser, yahoo-pipes development-platform), intergration (i.e. enterpises take on web2 modus operandi, stadards based, service oriented, etc.).
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
hope so
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
heilutteleeko se käsiä?
1 month, 2 weeks ago by viilee.
demographich revolution
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
net generation alkaa 1976 syntyneistä
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
aivot kehittyy kuin lihakset kuormituksessa - uusi pelejä ja sosiaalista mediaa käyttävä mediasukupolvi saa erilaiset aivot
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
olivat pyytäneet nuoria tekemään kollaaseja siitä miltä tuntuisi olla ilman sosiaalista mediaa - aika tuskaa - irtirevitty fiilis
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
olivat pyytäneet nuoria tekemään kollaaseja siitä miltä tuntuisi olla ilman sosiaalista mediaa - aika tuskaa - irtirevitty fiilis
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
esiteltiin net generation norms
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
net generation (baby-boomer echo): yes they use the web, yes its a gap appearing, globally the young people live in india and china. russia hardly any, same goes for most west. countries. these are the digital natives are quite reliant on their conncetivity. This is the generation of content creators (brain actually developes diffrently if you compute/play games, brain is like a muscle - the parts of it that are used to get more powerful). This generation has some new norms: freedom, customization, scrutinity, integrity, collaboration, entertainment, speed, innovation (WTF, innovation as a norm, i thought its a way to speak with out sating much).
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
collaborative content communities ohitti monella alueella perinteiset mediat nettihuomiossa 2006
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
collaborative meritocracies - onko se pyramidi vai sipuli? - tänään se on pyramidi
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
social revolution: blogger gets more hits than CNN = collaborative things are winning (its not enough to passively feed the news, but get comments, I'm ready for some fresh insights, come on!), wikipedia = 1 million editors committed to the idea of collaboration for knowledge, collaborative meritocraties (a mix a hieracrhichy, collaborative meritocracy, top is responsible for vision, filtering, making final decisions and SETTING STANDARDS for key processes), middle is the key-contributors (influence and contribute) and finlaly the freeriders and casual commentators.
(heiluttelee käsiään, vähän)
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
market / economic revolution: as the cost of collaboration has fallen, the ability to find people who can contribute parts to your value processes has dramatically fallen. that makes corporations virtual and global mass collaboration the way to produce (now were getting somewhere, prior this sounded like a first year tech. research analyst practise presentation). ultimately this means that talent is inside and outisde the corporations. Now Linux Explosion (or something like that) managed to link the open source mode into big corporations like IBM, that managed to sell more consulting and services that run on linux. this resulted into one billion biz for IBM. Ideagoras: Innocentive by P&G, tried to source 50% of innovations outside the company. The company realised that they can only hire only 0.5 % of experts on the market. Now the company have scientists around the world. Prosumtion (really do not rate this word, sorry, its still very produsction-consumption -circle-driven). Combination of the two.
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
New Models of Scientific Collaboration: earth systeem grid, word community grid, human genome, ksy survey, etc. mass collaboration is rapidly speeding up for example in astronomy. MC could have implications to "genome ownership". it was at one point 50% of the code was in private hands. merc changed this, by opening up on and competition became on excution, the applications, not ther genoma itself.
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
the future of small and large enterprises is in worldsourcing: no single HQ, porous corporate boundaries combined global processes and capabilities.
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
Marko Parkkinen asks: what happens to the world economics if innovation is open? Williams: 1. value crfeation is shifting to new boundaries, the money comes from new markets - it hurts some companies, but there's ecosystems of new. 2. free collaboration may eventually lead into monetisation of the innovations and other contributions - free collaboration will not be that free in the future. AND you need still people inside the companies, someone has to transform the innovations into saleable products and services. this is healthy for the economics.
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
public sector: there's a future of the public sector research that new paradigm starts... web 2.0 tools to engage people into policy discussions. its also possible to get innovations for the public services from the users. the US fed uses wikis for example - CIA has put together intellipedia (am I tripping?). It gathers security data from governement officials on different offices - this is not open to everyone, but there's different layers of secrecy (I'm not tripping).
1 month, 2 weeks ago by mokka.
Täältä kans toisaalle: http://pirkka.jaiku.com/presence/3011404...
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
Täältä saa ne muistiinpanot, minulta ainoastaan omat ranskalaiset viivani! :-D
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pirkka.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nieminensun...
1 month, 2 weeks ago by nieminensundell.
Milloin koittaa Net Generaation jälkeinen aika? Puhutaanko sukupolvista vai tietynlaisen käyttökulttuurin (kulttuurisen muutoksen?) "normalisoitumisesta"? Kehittyykö Nettisukupolvella instant mediaymmärrys? By doing? By being? Eikö internetin tulevaisuus olekaan moniaistisuus ja reaaliaikaisuus, miten Williamsin "3D web" sopii kuvioihin? Mitä arvoa 3D tuo yritysten toimintatapoihin? Julkisten palveluiden web-presenssille? Jaikuamiselle?
1 month, 2 weeks ago by soppa.
Ehkä tässä voisi olla kyse kulttuurikynnyksestä, jonka jälkeen sukupolvet ovat osa "uutta" käyttökulttuuria. By doing.
1 month, 2 weeks ago by nieminensundell.
Käyttökulttuurin normalisoituminen ei ihan vielä kuulosta sukupolvirajalta. Tosi hatara arvaukseni seuraavaksi sukupolvirajaksi on ilmastonmuutos - siihen reagoiminen ja sitä rajoittavan elämäntavan omaksuminen. Tai vaikka kybernetiikka.
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
Mä kyllä rikon tommosia sukupolvirajoja ikoko ajan ihan itse. Ja kybernetiikka oli tosi muodikasta 70-luvulla.
1 month, 2 weeks ago by nieminensundell.
Miks noita sukupolvia ylipäätään kelataan niin innokkaasti?
Wikipediasta löytyy artikkelit ainakin sukupolvista: X, Y, Z ja I. Ja XY-sukupolvikin on tunnistettu :-)
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
@nieminensundell meinasin kybernetiikan käyttöönottoa omaan kehoon. mutta se nyt oli täysin väkinäistä muutosvoiman hakemista tähän sukupolvikeskusteluun.
1 month, 2 weeks ago by pe3.
Sukupolvet on tärkeitä firmoille, jotka segmentoi kuluttajiaan. Ne haluaa demografista rajanvetoa, jotta voivat kohdentaa viestejään oikeisiin markkinointikanaviin.
1 month, 2 weeks ago by nieminensundell.